Tuesday, August 15

Third Parties

There are certain groups of people who are, romantically speaking, off limits to those currently single. Some are obvious, like those already in a relationship (unless, of course, you're SRK or Rani), those that are too young or too old, or those that just plain aren't interested in you back.

There are less obvious groups as well though. Like those not compatible in a more practical sense (due to religion, culture or family), or those that will bring you nothing but trouble and grief no matter how attractive they are on paper. The group I want to talk about here, however, I like to call Third Parties.

This is that group of people who, in theory, have nothing to do with these matters (unlike, say, family who are rather more legitimate) but in practice actually have quite a big influence on any decision you may make. I know it's a bit of a reach but maybe an (admittedly contrived) example will help demonstrate what I mean here:

  • Boy and Girl are good friends already.
  • Girl likes Boy.
  • Girl makes her feelings clear to Boy.
  • Boy doesn't like Girl in that way and tells her so.
  • Boy and Girl remain good friends.
  • Boy, however, does like Girl's Sister. Oh yes.
  • However Boy cannot do anything 'cos he doesn't want to hurt the feelings of Girl.
Where Girl is the Third Party in this case. Now Girl could be perfectly mature and adult enough to wish nothing but happiness on Boy and her Sister. Or Girl could be over Boy (like, hello, he was SO last week) and have already found someone else to obsess on. However, unless this is made explicit, Boy has no way of knowing and being the considerate soul he is will carry on protecting Girl.

Extremely Dawsonesque and unrealistic right... or is it? I think people avoid forming relationships based on these Third Parties all the time. A slightly different example is how some guys will never move in on a girl whom their best mate has already made clear he's interested in. Love triangles are sticky enough without the risk of hurting someone you consider to be your good friend too. I think it happens more often than we realise, but is just a bit too subtle to see each time it does.

It doesn't even have to involve geometry: the third party might not even like the other guy or girl or see you in that way, but if they're involved in your life enough that particular relationship could be a problem for them anyway. Close friends hold these implicit "veto rights" over each other pretty often I think.

So, ok, they do exist. But is this a reasonable situation to be in? Some may argue that making someone feel bad for a few days is a small price to pay for something that may prove to be much greater in the long term. And then if they're a real friend it shouldn't matter anyway. And if we all always allowed others to dictate who we like and who we don't we'd quite probably never get anywhere, so something has to give eventually. On the other hand, for some, a good known friendship is much more important than a potential love. So bros over hoes for the guys and vice versa for the girls.

I guess it all depends what's on stake at the time - whether the friendship etc really does mean that much and whether there really is something else there worth risking it for. However you look at it, and whether it's something that concerns you on a personal level at all, I suppose it's just one more aspect of relationships that make them so blummin' interesting.

6 comments:

  1. LMAO LMAO! sighh... you just think of everythingggg :-P

    ReplyDelete
  2. sighs

    get this guy a girlfriend!

    ReplyDelete
  3. >>I think people avoid forming relationships based on these Third Parties all the time.

    with all due respect deary, i beg to differ. i mean heck i havent looked into it as a matter of fact or research but (ime when one wants something, they try all they can to attain it) my instincts tell me there are far more people who are selfish and want their love/crush to conquer than those who'll reluctantly allow their feelings to take a back seat for fear of upsetting a friend. point is if its a friend, srely they should understand and would what your, i.e the friends, happiness and its ludicrous to sacrifice something which could potentially be lifechanging when you dont actually fancy the friend whose feelings youre so worried about in the first place. i can understand one would have to be careful and not play the usual mind games around the friend but as long as your conscience is clear, i.e you havent gone behind someones back, or betrayed ones trust or whatnot, you shouldnt have to worry about it that much for it to stop you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. i know a few people who are precious about their ex's, the people they fancy and even their friends in that they don't like a friend from one groups to form a friendship with a friend from another group! lol. women!

    as far as i'm concerned, if i like someone and they like me, and we're both single, we have no moral obligation to anyone to not get together. sure if i was in a situation where i knew a friend of mine also had feelings for that person, i'd handle it with sensitivity but it wouldn't stop me going out with them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. My brain hurts from reading that..lol but i think i've got the triangles :p I think that if the 3rd party is just a good friend, they should be able to understand and let you make the move. Why hold someone back? Isn't that being selfish?

    However....

    If there are romantic feelings on the side of the 3rd party, then you've got urself a sticky situation. Then you gotta decide whether your friendship w/ the 3rd party is worth risking. Yea its a pretty sucky situation with a catch-22 for sure.

    wasalaam,

    Madiha :D

    ReplyDelete
  6. im all for third party love

    if it wasnt for third party love.. we wouldnt have Joey and Pacey Love..

    think about it!!!

    ReplyDelete